LINKED UP

May 17, 2005

A Tale of Three Kings - Book Review

Rating:


Gene Edwards

An intriguing story of the life, situations, and reactions of three kings--Saul, David, and Absalom. Using the Bible's account of David's choices as a framework, Gene Edwards lays out a very powerful case for the sovereign control of our God even in the most unimaginable situations. Edwards gives a delightfully human emotion to the struggles and thoughts that could have been floating around in David's head while his troubles with Saul and Absalom were in full swing. David is painted as having very humble responses in His encounters with insubordination, pride, and slander. His brokenness is portrayed perfectly. True leadership can only come through brokenness under God's control and power. The author paints God as in control, man as under His power, and every circumstance only as another opportunity to trust the All-sufficient. This book is a quick easy read (only 2-3 page chapters…100 pages in all.) Don't let the size fool you, though. It is solid. It should be noted that this book provides a beautiful variety to your reading. He has a mysteriously captivating style of story-telling that just draws you into what he is saying. It was refreshing.

Loved it. This book is a classic. Somehow, Edwards was able to bring me under deep conviction under the guise of sweeping me into a very intriguing, twisting story. I loved the fresh look at the narrative, but yet at the same time, by the end of each chapter, I kept getting whacked over the head with my own sinful reactions and my own pride in much easier trials. I still wanted to read more. I finished this book in 2 days; I was loving it. I didn't want it to end. I wanted more.

Each mini-chapter examines a different side of brokenness. Whether it is how to get good at dodging spears, or how important it is not to throw back those spears that are thrown at you, Edwards uses all the plunges in David's life to show off David's amazingly humble life. He describes David's pain as the news of his sons mutiny spreads to the palace, and yet in it all, David trusts. David trusts the God that delivered him from the power of a bear, the strength of a giant, even the snare of a deranged king Saul. He submits and submits and submits and submits and submits, no matter what.

The truth that is most evident in this book is that adversity is designed to break us into submission. David's difficulties, beginning with the days in the field as a shepherd boy and ending in the palace with a usurping son, only broke him to see and trust God. They taught him the submission that must come, and the leadership that is true. The leadership that only God can give.

[The days in the wilderness] were David's darkest hours. You know them as his pre-king days, but he didn't. He assumed this was his lot forever.

Suffering was giving birth. Humility was being born.

By earthly measures he was a shattered man; by heaven's measure, a broken one.

God has a university. It's a small school. Few enroll, even fewer graduate. Very few indeed.

God has this school because he does not have broken men. Instead He has several types of men. He has men who claim to be God's authority…and aren't; men who claim to be broken…and aren't. And men who are God's authority, but who are mad and unbroken. And he has regretfully, a spectroscopic mixture of everything in between. All of these He has in abundance; but broken men, hardly at all.

In God's sacred school of submission and brokenness, why are there so few students? Because all who are in this school must suffer pain. And as you might guess, it is often the unbroken ruler (whom God soveriegnly picks) who meats out the pain. David was once a student in this school, and Saul was God's chosen way to crush David.

"You underestimate your adversary," retorted Abishai.

"You underestimate my God," replied David serenely.

"But why, David? Why not fight?"

"It is better I be defeated, even killed, than to learn the ways of . . . of a Saul, or the ways of an Absalom. The kingdom is not that valuable. Let him have it, if that be the Lord's will. I repeat: I shall not learn the ways of either Sauls or Absaloms."


Posted by jonkopp at May 17, 2005 06:11 PM | TrackBack
Comments

I've also enjoyed this volume. Brokenness is indeed required along the way - my hope is that the saints don't become so occupied with it that they become too paralysed to assist others.

Edwards, btw, was an early advocate of house churches. Some of his other books are likely advertised in the back of Three Kings.

Carry on, brother!

Posted by: Zane Anderson at September 29, 2005 02:55 PM

I came home from school last night just in time to hear you and Franklin discuss your book A Tale of Three Kings and the life of humility. How God will us any means necessary to strenthen you and harden you to difficult(Isa. 41:10). God is helping me to die to self and take on His nature. I have been submitting to His will and ways of loving those who are unloving and hurting the most. Nothing just happens so I got on the internet to review your site and book. I am so learning to be content in every situation no matter what. Thank you for your confirmation that I am allowing God to have His way with me as I go through my journey. I read how David behaved himself wisely and more wisely in his battle to become king in the physical. He was already king but had to fight to become what God wanted to teach him by submission and trust as a leader.

Posted by: Cheryl at October 12, 2005 09:20 AM

Brokenness is God's work. Although it is vital to the release of the Spirit, "brokeness" should not become something to be preoccupied with. The Lord will handle this His way and in His time.'
God bless.

Posted by: Johnny at December 15, 2005 03:51 PM

Jon,

did you write the review at the top of your blog or did you get it some where else? If you did write it I would like quote your review and give you credit. Joan

Posted by: joan at November 13, 2006 02:16 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?